🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn followers recognizing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of respondents applauding your insights on expanding your venture? Do recruiters making contact to explore collaborations?

Should that not be the case, the reason might be your gender.

The Test: Modifying Gender Identity to achieve Better Visibility

Numerous women participated in a collective professional network test this week after viral posts suggested that switching their gender to "man" enhanced their network presence.

Some participants modified their profiles to include what they termed "bro-coded" language - adding action-focused business buzzwords like "propel", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Based on reports, their visibility also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Raised

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether an inherent gender bias in the platform's system favors male users who use online business jargon.

Similar to many large networking sites, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to determine which posts appear to which users - promoting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the trend but claimed it does not consider "personal characteristics" when determining content distribution. Instead, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" influence how content are received.

Modifying profile gender on your profile does not affect how your content shows up in results or timelines.

Individual Results

Simone Bonnett, who modified her gender identifiers to "male pronouns" and her profile name to "Simon E", described remarkable results.

"The statistics I'm seeing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, started testing after noticing her audience decrease substantially.

The Process

• First, she changed her profile gender to "male"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rewrite her professional summary using "male-coded" wording
• Finally, she repurposed previous content with similar "assertive" style

The outcome was instantaneous: a more than fourfold rise in reach within seven days.

The Downside

Despite the success, Cornish expressed dissatisfaction with the method.

"Before, my content were more personal - brief and insightful, but also friendly and relatable," she stated. "Currently, the bro-coded version was assertive and confident - similar to a white male swaggering around."

She discontinued the experiment after one week, saying "Every day I continued, and results got better, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Some testers experienced positive results. Cass Cooper who changed both her gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "white" reported a decrease in visibility and interaction.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to understand how it functions in specific cases or why," she remarked.

Broader Implications

These experiments coincide with ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's unique role as both a business platform and social space.

Recent changes in the past few months have reportedly caused female creators experiencing significantly reduced exposure, resulting in informal experiments where identical content by men and women received vastly different reach.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the network uses artificial intelligence to categorize and distribute posts based on various elements, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company states it regularly evaluates its systems, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

Company representative suggested that current reductions in certain members' visibility might originate from increased competition due to additional posts on the network.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester observed, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly competitive and less controlled."