🔗 Share this article

In a per curiam ruling, the highest judicial body has allowed Texas to use a redrawn congressional boundary scheme that could add as many as five additional Republican-leaning districts. The 6-3 ruling, released on Thursday, upholds a request by the state to overturn a lower court's ruling that had rejected the new map in November.

Court's Reasoning

The federal judge erroneously placed itself into an active primary campaign, generating significant confusion and disturbing the delicate balance of power in elections, the supreme court said in justifying its ruling.

The federal court had earlier ruled that Texas had probably sorted voters based on their race – a method known as illegal race-based districting – when it passed the new maps. It had mandated the state to revert to the boundaries established after the most recent national count for the forthcoming election.

Stinging Opposition

Through a forcefully written objection, Justice Elena Kagan criticized the majority's ruling. She contended that it undermined the work of the district court, noting that its ruling was actually authored by a judge selected by ex-President Donald Trump.

Our position is above the district court, but our capability is not greater for resolving such fact-driven issues, Kagan wrote in a dissent co-signed by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

The justice went on, The majority's order ensures that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its increased partisan advantage, will control next year's elections. And it means that many Texas voters, for no good reason, will be grouped in electoral districts based on their race. And that result, as this court has pronounced repeatedly, is a violation of the U.S. Constitution.

National Map-Drawing Battle

This decision is part of a nationwide fight over the redistricting of electoral maps. Texas is a crucial component in campaigns to alter the U.S. House map to secure a fragile Republican hold. Usually, redistricting takes place after a ten-year survey. Yet the move by Texas Republicans to proceed with a brazen off-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer sparked a chain reaction among other states.

Conservative legislators in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also passed redistricting plans that are estimated to yield several additional GOP-friendly seats. The opposition, meanwhile, have countered with their own plans in including California and Virginia, which might neutralize those potential gains.

Partisan Reactions

Lone Star State top lawyer praised the High Court's decision. In a release, he said the order upheld Texas's basic authority to draw a map that secures electoral outcomes supportive of Republicans. Texas is paving the way as we take our country back, district by district, state by state, he stated.

In contrast, opposition party officials decried the outcome. It's incredibly disappointing that the Court has rubber stamped a map enacted by Texas Republicans which, simply put, is an extreme, racially gerrymandered map, said the leader of a major party campaign committee.

Another senior Democratic figure stated the court had once again shredded its legitimacy by rubber-stamping a racially gerrymandered map. The ruling demonstrates a willingness to subvert democracy. This Texas plan is a partisan, racially biased scheme to undermine voter will, especially in communities of color, he added.